What DO YOU THINK?!?! Help Others, Help Yourself!
Rules of the game: Provided your peers with feedback.
-You must review TWO websites in every Grade Level =SIX websites Per Person!
-You must answer the following questions FOR EVERY WEBSITE & STATE YOUR EVIDENCE!
-What does state your evidence mean?!?! State your evidence means you must give a detailed explanation for why you think what you think. You may NOT only say, “They did a good job!” or “It was horrible!” You must back up your thoughts with evidence about WHY they did a good job.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
JG
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
By: Tyler D. & Blaine V. Period 6
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
Eh….
• Was it easy to understand?
YES
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
Only the first slide. The rest of it was VERY boring.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Sure.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
BE CREATIVE
• What was the best part of the site?
The first slide.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
ALL OF IT!
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
no
• What section did they do the best on?
Naming the subject
• What section did they need to improve on?
All of it
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
C+. because.
JG
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Amaris B. and LiAnn R. Period 7
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
Super gooooooodd
• Was it easy to understand?
yeps.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
FANTASTICAL
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
eh sure why not.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
A little more color range
• What was the best part of the site?
Pretty cool all around
• What part of the site needed improvement?
None
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
yep
• What section did they do the best on?
all
• What section did they need to improve on?
none
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A. it was awsm
CL
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• Alex M. and Hank W. 6th grade.
What do you think of the content?
I think the information is very informative. Each step is easy to follow and not hard to understand. When they explain the formula for the area of a circle they described each part of the equation.
Did it grab your attention?
it seemed easy to understand, so if I would ever wish to learn the area of the circle I would definitely refer to this PowerPoint.
What suggestions do you have?
More practice problems and step by step instructions.
What about the rubric?
Sort of. They were missing some information. Ex: References that would be helpful
• I think they did the best explaining on what the area of a circle was.
• Instructions and other step by step instructions.
What grade would you give you site?
B- It was very good, but missing some rubric requirements.
CL
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• James M. Kainan W. 8th grade.
What do you think of the content?
• Its interesting, and informative. It’s also easy to follow.
Did it grab your attention?
• they were interesting, and were related to the project.
• it made me understand it easily, and I would have been very confident if I had to try it.
What suggestions do you have?
• organize your assessment more.
• the How To part was really easy to understand.
• assessment, hard to understand what to do.
What about the rubric?
• yes they followed the rubric
• How-to is very good.
• assessment needs improvement
What grade would you give you site?
• A , its very easy to understand, and follows the rubric.
S.A.
ReplyDeleteT.D. and B.V. 6th grade
Good quality math but it was sometimes hard to understand what they were trying to show or teach. The graphics were good they made me want to do the math, but with some of the colors you couldn’t read the information very well. I think it was a good power point over all I would do is put more pictures in it there were no pictures and that would have made the power point better. The best thing about the power point was the information and tests. Yes they mostly followed the rubric.
CL
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
Amaris B. and LiAnn R. 7th grade
what do you think of the content?
I think it is very organized, and well made. It is very colorful, and unique. It grabs people’s attention once they look at it.
Did it grab your attention?
• I thought the background was very interesting, and colorful.
• it made me want to look at the page more, and research what they were talking about.
What suggestions do you have?
• put the vocab definitions next to the words, even if they are defined throughout the webpage.
• Number types were very interesting, and I liked looking over the page. It was fun to use, and nice to look at.
• Less text, because it gets boring to read
what about the rubric?
• Yes they did from what I saw.
• Number types.
• Decimals, too much text.
What grade would you give you site?
• B- too much text, but the PowerPoint is very interesting to look at if I had the time.
S.A.
ReplyDeleteT.D. and B.V. 6th grade
Good quality math but it was sometimes hard to understand what they were trying to show or teach. The graphics were good they made me want to do the math, but with some of the colors you couldn’t read the information very well. I think it was a good power point over all I would do is put more pictures in it there were no pictures and that would have made the power point better. The best thing about the power point was the information and tests. Yes they mostly followed the rubric.
CL
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• AC 8th grade honors
what do you think of the content?
It was very interesting, seemed easy to understand, I would like to read more about it, not much info though.
Did it grab your attention?
• the graphics were al graphs, they had writing on them that made me understand the question easily.
• it made me interested in trying out the project/assignment.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest you add more information
• I liked the step-by-step instructions.
• all of it needed more information., ex: shading and graphing
What about the rubric?
• they followed the rubric mostly.
• step-by-step instructions.
• shading, and graphing, and other ways. Explaining how to do each problem, or what each problem is.
What grade would you give you site?
• B- because it needs more information, but still follows the rubric.
E.G.
ReplyDeleteQuestions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
M. F. and E.R 6th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
the quality of the math was very good because the explain how to so it and the show examples that really help
Did it grab your attention?
Yes it did grab my attention because the site is fun to go through and its fun to read all of that teaches you the right things
• What did you think of the graphics?
They are good they make you want to read it and look at it.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes as I stated before I liked it because of the graphics
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I would suggest they don’t make it so difficult to get to another slide.
• What was the best part of the site?
the best part of it was flipping the pages to the book and solving the problem.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
the links to get to the next slides are difficult to find.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yeah they had all they needed.
What section did they do the best on?
I think the best one was the assessment.
What section did they need to improve on?
They need to improve on their vocabulary the could have had more.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give it an A because you can tell that they really tried and they did their best on it.
GF
ReplyDeleteBT & EW – Grade 6
The quality of the math was easy to understand. Their order and content of the PowerPoint presentation was very clear and organized!
I liked the graphics they used. It made me want to try their math problems!
I don’t have any suggestions, I like everything they did!
They looked like they followed the rubric. I like the fact that they also included fun games to play on their resources.
I, personally, would give BT & EW an “A”!!!
GF
ReplyDeleteNH & PM – Grade 7
The quality of the math was easy to understand.
I like the graphics they used. It made me want to try their math problems!
My only suggestion to these students would be to follow the rubric step-by-step and do more than just practice problems. Maybe use a little bit more color and make your PowerPoint a little longer too.
I, personally, would give NH & PM a “B”!!
GF
ReplyDeleteSD & MC – Grade 8
The quality of the math was easy to understand. Their order and content of the PowerPoint presentation was very clear and organized!
I loved the graphics they used! It made me want to do math!
My only suggestion to these students would be to make it a little more understandable for 8th grade students.
They looked like they followed the rubric. I love the fact that they used Excel graphs in their PowerPoint!
I, personally, would give SD & MC an “A”!!!
GF
ReplyDeleteCL & EG – 8th Grade Honors
The quality of the math was easy to understand. Their order and content of the PowerPoint presentation was very clear and organized!
I think these students needed just a little more graphics and color to really make their project POP!
What I would also suggest is to not put “The End” at the end of their slides because it seems a little babyish.
I, personally, would give CL & EG an “A”!!!
E.G.
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
B.S S.D
what do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was awesome they showed everything they needed I understood everything.
• Was it easy to understand?
yes it was I understood everything.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
They were great they describe everything you need and they are imformative.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
yeah I actually tried one of the problems myself.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
i liked it and
• What was the best part of the site?
The best part is the slides where they show you the examples.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
they needed improvement in the examples.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
They did but they didn’t do a real life example.
• What section did they do the best on?
They did the best one in their test.
• What section did they need to improve on?
none I think it was great
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them an A because I liked it and they did great
Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Makena F. and Emma R. 6th grade honors
what do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
it was easy to understand and it was good quality
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
the graphics were really good, it made me want to try math
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I have no suggestions
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
Yes, they followed the rubric
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them an A because they followed the rubric and there work was good
A.A.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Nick H. and Paul M. 7th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
The quality of the math was pretty good
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
It didn’t really make me want to do math
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The explaining of what it is I think needs improvment
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
they pretty much followed the rubric
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them a B because I think they could’ve done better explaining
A.A.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Isaac M. Cory R. 8th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
the quality of the math was good
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
not much graphics
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
No suggestions
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They followed the rubric
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them an A because they followed the rubric
A.A.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Edgar G. and Claudia L. 8th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
the quality of the math was good, it was easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
No suggestions
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They followed the rubric
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them an A because they had good work and followed the rubric
A.A.
S.A.
ReplyDeleteS.A. and H.H. 7th grade
The quality of the math was good and it was also easy to understand most of the time, I think they should have put smaller paragraphs so it would be less boring and so it would be easier to understand. I think there needed to be more color and or pictures. I didn’t really want to learn the math. I would tell them that they need more pictures and colors. I would also tell them that they had a lot of good information and they made it pretty easy to understand. Yes they did follow the rubric they had every thing included. I would give this group a medium “A” because they had all the requirements they just didn’t grab the reader’s attention because there was not enough pictures or colors.
I.M. and C.R. 8th grade
They did a good job showing what to do for the math, it was easy for me to understand. Yes it grabbed my attention but and I wanted to do the math and learn how to do it. I think the best part of the power point was the way they showed you how to solve the problems using the pictures. The thing that they should do better on would be to add more information on some slides. Yes they followed the rubric from what I could see. I would give them an “A” because they had all the things the needed and had good pictures and colors. I think it was a good power point.
A.C. 8th grade honors
They should how to solve the math pretty well, it was also pretty easy to understand. It grabbed my attention a little bit but not a whole lot because there were not very many pictures and it looked a little boring. I still kind of wanted to do the math tough. My suggestions would be to put in more pictures so people are more likely to want to learn if it doesn’t look fun they might not want to learn it. I think he did a good job with the information though it was very detailed. Yes he followed the rubric. I would give the power point an “A” because it had all the information it just needed more color and pictures.
E.G.
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
E.B. 8th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
Not very good she didn’t even finish it.
• Was it easy to understand?
yeah she had good examples.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
They could of done better the slide is plain.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
no it not very fin to go through.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
To take their time next time and finish it.
• What was the best part of the site?
I liked the box and whisker plot she made.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
just the end she didn’t finish it.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
No they didn’t have many things that were needed.
• What section did they do the best on?
They did the best in the box and whisker plot.
• What section did they need to improve on?
they jus need to improve the end.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them a c because the didn’t finish and they were missing a lot of things.
C.C-G
ReplyDeleteM.F and E.R 6th grade
The quality was good and there were animations and 3d objects.
The document was easy to understand and the math was good.
The graphics were neat and the website was organized.
The website made me want to try it because it was clean and nice and made sense.
To the authors, the site might need more writing.
The best part was the interactive problems.
The vocab and what is parts needed more writing.
I would give it a B because it was good and fun, but needed more writing.
A.B and L.R 7th grade
The quality was good, it was a nice website, and was easy to understand, but there were no practice problems.
The site was nice, neat, and clean and it was easy to understand.
The site was cool and fun to read. The quality was nice and it made me want to try the problems.
A suggestion I have is to put practice problems on the page.
The best part of the site was how they worded it because they did a very good job.
What needed improvement was the test and problems because they were not on the page.
They followed the rubric, and did very well with writing.
They needed improvement with the practice problems because there were none.
I would give them a b because they did a good job on the site, but needed practice problems.
M.M and J.O 8th grade
The quality was ok and the math was pretty easy to understand, but they could have worded it better and made it more interesting.
The graphics weren’t very good and the quality did not make me want to do math.
Some suggestion I have would be to make the wording better, and have more graphics. The vocab was good, but almost everywhere could have used improvement.
They mostly followed the rubric, but some parts were missing. They did best on the vocab, but needed standards and there were spelling errors.
I would give it a c because the quality was good, but the power point was nothing special.
A.C 8th grade honors
The quality was good because it stayed on topic, but it was not very easy to understand because it was very complicated for a beginner.
There were no graphics on the page, and it was not very fun so I did not want to try it out.
A suggestion was to have graphics and make it more colorful and fun so the reader wants to try it out. The best part was it was highly detailed, but it needed to be more fun and interesting.
They followed the rubric, but needed graphics and to be more compelling. He did a good job with wording it out.
I would give him a C because he only did a good job explaining, but it was not fun and was very hard to follow.
S.G.
ReplyDelete7th grade
A.B and L.R
Great website. Explained things well, was very creative and made you want to keep reading it. Had all most of the criteria of off of the rubrics. I would give this website an A+ because I know that that was hard to do and they did a great job.
8th Grade
CG and JB
I thought it was a pretty good power point. They explained their topic well, and made it easy and not boring by separating steps. The only things I would change would be the designs of the slides, they could be more creative. I think it followed requirements pretty well so it should probably get an A.
8th grade honors
CD and AJ
It was a pretty good website. I thought that it was designed well, and the explanations for what they were teaching were really good and easy to follow, but I think that it needed some more complex questions so that people learning could understand more than just that one concept. Over all, following the rubric I would give it an A.
A.M
ReplyDelete1. Graphing points by T.D B.V 6th grade
2. The quality of the math was good.
3. yes, everything was detailed
4. The graphics weren’t that good everything was very simple.
5. No, it didn’t not make me want to do math
6. better graphics
7. the graphs are the best part
8. it is hard to read some of the words
9. They followed the rubric pretty well
10. They did good on the mini quiz
11. I would give them a B
1. Exponential equations by N.H, P.M 7th grade
2. The quality of the math was good.
3. It could’ve been a little more detailed.
4. There were barely any graphics.
5. No, it did not make me want to do math.
6. Better info and graphics
7. The test was made very nicely
8. The practice problems
9. They followed the rubric ok
10. Making the tests.
11. I would give them a C
1. Graphing linear equations by S.D M.C 8th grade
2. The math was really good
3. It was nicely detailed, because they explained how to do the math
4. No background graphics, it made the slides look boring
5. No, it did not make me want to do math
6. Make better Backgrounds
7. I liked the Vocabulary page.
8. The letters were hard to read because on the “why are they useful” page the letters were different colors/.
9. They did a good job following the rubric.
10. They did god on the problems page, because the layout was nice.
11. I would give them a low A because they did well but they were missing some parts.
1. Graphing Linear Inequalities A.C 8th grade
2. The quality of the math was good.
3. It needs graphics because the slides are all one tone and very plain.
4. The slides are very boring he also has to much slides and some of them are empty.
5. No, it did not make me want to do math
6. He has to have more graphics in the slides.
7. I liked the reasons page.
8. Some of the letters were hard to read.
9. He did a good job following the rubric.
10. He did a good job on the answer pages the layout was nice
11. I would give him a B because everything he did is all over the place.
A.E.,
ReplyDeleteT.D. and B.V.
Period 6
Grade 6
What do you think of the content?
-How was the quality of the math?
-Was it easy to understand?
Did it grab your attention?
-What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics were a little hard to see and quite small.
-Did it make you want to do math?
It was a little dry some more attention grabbing graphics would have helped.
What suggestions do you have?
-What was the best part of the site?
The best thing was that everything was very clear and organized.
-What could they improve on?
Again probably making it more entertaining to read and better graphics.
What about the rubric?
-Did they follow the rubric?
You followed the rubric very well.
-What section did they do the best on?
You both did very well on most things.
-What section could you improve?
You had no vocabulary
What grade would you give the site?
A solid A+
N.H. and P.M.
Grade 7
What do you think of the content?
-How was the quality of the math?
The practice problems were good.
-Was it easy to understand?
The order was confusing
-Did it grab your attention?
Yes, it did grab my attention.
-What did you think of the graphics?
Though it was simple, I liked the graphics and it did catch my attention.
-Did it make you want to do math?
-What suggestions do you have?
Work on the organization.
-What was the best part of the site?
The practice problems.
-What could they improve on?
Organization
What about the rubric?
-Did they follow the rubric?
Not very well.
-What section did they do the best on?
The how to problems were well done.
-What section did they need to improve on?
The organization.
What grade would you give the site?
Low B or a C
E.B.
Period 2
Grade 8
What do you think of the content?
-How was the quality of the math?
From what there was, the math was good.
-Was it easy to understand?
It was very easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
-What did you think of the graphics?
Not really, it was kind of boring.
-Did it make you want to do math?
Not really.
What suggestions do you have?
-What was the best part of the site?
The example and the vocabulary were very good.
-What could they improve on?
Finishing it.
What about the rubric?
-Did they follow the rubric?
Yes very well.
-What section did they do the best on?
Everything that they finished.
-What section did they need to improve on?
Finishing it.
What grade would you give the site?
D or F because it was not complete…if it were it would be around a solid A
A.C.
Period 2
Grade 8 Honors
What do you think of the content?
-How was the quality of the math?
Very good.
-Was it easy to understand?
It was very easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
-What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics were great!
-Did it make you want to do math?
Very nice job on the graphs.
What suggestions do you have?
-What was the best part of the site?
Everything was wonderfull.
-What could they improve on?
Grabbing the attention of the reader better with cooler backgrounds.
What about the rubric?
-Did they follow the rubric?
Yes he did.
-What section did they do the best on?
Everything was great.
-What section did they need to improve on?
Backgrounds
What grade would you give the site?
A+
DC
ReplyDelete8th Honors-
Who are you talking about?
• AJ CD
What do you think of the content?
• They explained how to solve the problem in a detailed and interesting way. They also had pictures to show us what to do.
• It was short and sweet and it was very easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• They had random pictures on the website and it made it more appealing. It also was colorful so it wasn’t boring.
• The reason I wanted to do the math was because the website was extremely easy to understand.
What suggestions do you have?
• You should make it a little bit easier to navigate.
• It was exciting to look at and it taught me the subject well.
• It was hard to find things and they could make that a little bit better.
What about the rubric?
• Yes they followed the rubric.
• They did the best on the self assessment.
• They needed to improve on the bibliography.
What grade would you give you site?
• A- because it was simple and cool, but I couldn’t find certain parts of the website.
8th-
Who are you talking about?
• SD MC
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was pretty good.
• It was simple to understand and there were diagrams to illustrate where things were in the equation.
Did it grab your attention?
• It had math graphics but there were no fun graphics on the page which made it kind of bland.
• Yes it did. I enjoyed how easy it was to understand.
What suggestions do you have?
• Add some colors and more pictures.
• I liked the detailed diagram on Y=MX+B
• It needed more colors and I couldn’t find a self-assessment.
What about the rubric?
• Almost.
• They did the best on How To’s and the detailed description.
• I couldn’t find a self-assessment.
What grade would you give you site?
• B-, because it had everything except a self-assessment.
7th-
Who are you talking about?
• AB LR
What do you think of the content?
• It was good because it had a graphic that was very easy to understand and illustrate number relationships.
• The graphics made it very easy.
Did it grab your attention?
• It definitely grabbed my attention because it had colors and animations.
• It did make me want to do the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• Add some better colors and text because they kind of contrast in the beginning.
• I liked all the details they added into it that were not part of the rubric.
• Colors so it is easier to read and some images overlap text.
What about the rubric?
• They did and more.
• Describing the topic
• I couldn’t find anything.
What grade would you give you site?
• “A+,” because it is very easy to understand and also very interesting.
6th-
Who are you talking about?
• MW ZB.
What do you think of the content?
• It was amazing they did multiple projects to explain their topic to us
• It took us step-by-step so it was very easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• I liked all the colors, animations, and transitions they add to illustrate our topic.
• It definitely did.
What suggestions do you have?
• Put a mini page in instead of a power point so it is all one project.
• The test.
• Instead of power points and stuff embed it all into the website.
What about the rubric?
• They did.
• The test.
• Nothing really.
What grade would you give you site?
• “A+,” because they took it above and beyond what they needed to do.
TK
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• NH and PM- 7th grade
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math, I would say, is okay but it definitely could’ve been better. As soon as the PowerPoint started, it immediately went to how exponential equations work and didn’t even explain the topic you were talking about or the process to solve them. Next time, I would explain what you are talking about first and work them through the process before trying to do an example.
• To be honest, this PowerPoint was not that easy to understand. The slides were out of order and for the vocabulary the answers weren’t even listed until 5 slides after the words were listed. Also, there were practice problems on the second slide when the topic wasn’t even explained clearly yet. In the future, I would follow the rubric more and thoroughly explain what you are trying to teach.
Did it grab your attention?
• I thought the graphics were alright, even though there weren’t that many. Next time, add more color and fun to your PowerPoint to make it stand out more and make it more appealing.
• To be honest, I did not want to try the math from this PowerPoint. As I said before, one of the biggest issues for me was that you guys didn’t even explain the topic before putting a slide for practice problems. When I opened the PowerPoint as a reader I had no idea of what you guys were talking about. Therefore, I didn’t really want to try the math because I didn’t know how to do it or why it was important.
What suggestions do you have?
• To the authors, I would say that you guys did an okay job but next time make it look like you guys spent a little more time working on it. It’s confusing to read and doesn’t cover the topic enough to leave the reader feeling like they learned something.
• The best part of this site was that you guys listed a lot of vocabulary words. I liked that because it made sure the reader could fully understand what would be talked about in your PowerPoint.
• What needed improvement was the explanation of the topic in general. Next time, fully teach the topic before putting practice problems and an assessment and make it a bit more organized.
What about the rubric?
• They did a little, but they didn’t cover each topic the rubric asked and it was definitely unorganized.
• They did the best on vocab because there were numerous words listed but next time put the answers to the vocab on the same slide.
• They definitely (as I have said a million times) need to improve on organizational skills and fully explaining the topic! Make sure you guys know what you are talking about before trying to teach it.
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give this site a C because it was very unorganized and did not teach the reader very much about the topic. It was a confusing PowerPoint and hard to follow. In the end, I don’t truthfully think I learned much from your topic because of the way you explained it. Put more effort into it next time (:
E.G
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
A.M C.C
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was great I really enjoyed it .
• Was it easy to understand?
yeas It was easy to understand they organized really well.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
They were awesome I went through it enjoyed it and had some cool backgrounds.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
it did I tried to solve a few problems and they did really well explaining.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I would suggest they do this again they are great.
• What was the best part of the site?
I like their examples and the way they put links to whatever slide I want to go to.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I don’t think any of it I was great they explained everything they needed.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yeas they did everything.
• What section did they do the best on?
They did the best on their practice problems because they great to start with when you don’t know ho to do box and whisker plot.
• What section did they need to improve on?
just have a real life example.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A because the did great and they had everything they needed.
AC
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
AM and CC 8th Honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
The quality of the math was very good… the test questions and practice problems were great
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes it was very easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics, both related to and not related to the math, were great
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Their website definitely grabbed my attention but it might have kept my attention away from the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Make it a bit less flashy
• What was the best part of the site?
It grabbing your attention
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The test and practice problems were all the same quality (not easier to harder)
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
As far as I could tell though they only had five test questions
• What section did they do the best on?
Showing what a box and whiskers plot was
• what section did they need to improve on?
The test questions
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
B+ because of the small amount of test questions. Otherwise it was near perfect.
AC
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
CD and AJ 8th honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was really good
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes the explanation and questions were
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics were FANCY
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes it was simple and I would try it
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Difference in the practice questions
• What was the best part of the site?
It was easy to use
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Finding the Bibliography
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes as far as I could tell
• What section did they do the best on?
Graphics and practice questions (negatives)
• What section did they need to improve on?
Practice questions answers (zeros)
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A+ because it followed the rubric very closely
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 1
Who are you talking about?
• EG and CL: 8th Grade Honors.
What do you think of the content?
• The math was good, very nice examples, but one problem should’ve been simplified a bit more.
• It was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics, mainly equations, were very good examples.
• It made me want to try it out.
What suggestions do you have?
• I have none.
• It gave an excellent presentation.
• Nothing really needed improvement
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric.
• I believe the assessment questions were the best part.
• Nothing
What grade would you give the site?
• I’d give it an A for it’s quality and excellent work.
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 2
Who are you talking about?
• AJ and CD: 8th Grade Honors
What do you think of the content?
• The math was demonstrated very well.
• The simplified questions and answers made it easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were funny.
• It did make me want to try.
What suggestions do you have?
• I have no suggestions.
• The best part was probably the simplified way to find answers.
• Nothing needs improvement.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric.
• The part they did best on was the practice problems. Easy to hard.
• Like I said no improvement.
What grade would you give?
• A, everything was good quality
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 3
Who are you talking about?
• JB and CG: 8th Grade Math
What do you think of the content?
• The math was excellently done. It showed everything properly and in the correct order.
• It was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were appropriate for the presentation.
• It did make me want to try it out.
What suggestions do you have?
• Some words were spelled incorrect, but other than that it was fine.
• The best part was the way they made the words move around in different ways every time.
• Nothing needed improvement.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric.
• They did the animations the best.
• Nothing.
What grade would you give the site?
• A
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 4
Who are you talking about?
• BKB and AW: 8th Grade Math
What do you think of the content?
• The math was done properly.
• It was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were fine as the fit the project.
• It made me give it a shot.
What suggestions do you have?
• I have no suggestions.
• The best part was the custom illustrations and drawings.
• Nothing needed improvement
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric.
• The math was done particularly well.
• Nothing needed improvement.
What grade would you give the site?
• A, done properly.
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 5
Who are you talking about?
• SD and BS: 7th Grade Honors
What do you think of the content?
• The math was done very well.
• It was confusing at some points, but somewhat easy.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were appropriate for the show.
• It made me want to try it out.
What suggestions do you have?
• To make it a little more simplified, especially with all the graphics and words nearly overlapping each other.
• The graphics were the best part.
• Nothing else needed improvement.
Did they follow the rubric?
• They followed the rubric.
• The equations were done pretty well, as well as the explanations.
• Like I said, nothing.
What grade would you give the site?
• A
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 6
Who are you talking about?
• PM and NH: 7th Grade Honors.
What do you think of the content?
• The math was good, but it never showed any steps in the process.
• It was very confusing.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were appropriate, but I don’t see how the second set of billiard balls do.
• It made me want to try it, but the thing was so confusing I didn’t get it.
What suggestions do you have?
• My suggestion is to order the slides better, as some should come before others.
• The best part was the images. The billiard balls looked cool, but I still wonder why they’re there in the first place.
• The examples needed to be shown a lot better so people would find it easier.
What about the rubric?
• For the most part they followed the rubric, as some parts were absent.
• Though no steps shown, the equations were good and matched the concept.
• They need to improve the equations so people could get it better.
What grade would you give the site?
• I’d give it a high C because of the problems previously discussed.
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 7
Who are you talking about?
• TD and BV: 6th Grade Honors
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was average, mainly for not-that-hard equations, but that’s just me.
• It was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were appropriate for the presentation.
• I attempted the math and got all answers correct.
What suggestions do you have?
• I have none.
• The best part was the demonstrations.
• The graphs needed some improvement, mainly the boxes are uneven.
What about the rubric?
• They did follow the rubric, because everything is shown.
• They did the best on the examples on the mini-quizzes.
• Maybe steps shown would’ve helped a little bit.
What grade would you give the site?
• B, it was good but not 100%.
P.H
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
Alex M. and Hank W. Grade 6
What do you think of the content?
Their math content was very easy to understand. It explains the procedures step by step and very clearly so you never got lost a long the way while you learned the material. They really addressed their topic very clearly and didn’t really go off topic too often.
Did it grab your attention?
There weren’t too many graphics through out the power point presentation so I think that if there had been more the power point would have been a lot more interesting. It did make me want to do some math and it helped me touch up on how to find the area of a circle since I hadn’t done it in a while.
What suggestions do you have?
One suggestion I have for the authors of this power point is to add more pictures into the slide show so that the viewer doesn’t get bored while reading it. The best part of the power point was that you could clearly read all the words so they choose a very good back round and that they stayed on topic the majority of the time. The part that needed improvement was to add a little more detail in some of the parts.
What about the rubric?
The section that I feel like they did the best on was explaining what their topic was on. The section they need to improve on it to put why you would need to use that math quality in real life because no where in the power point did it say anything about that. At times they followed the rubric perfectly but in some parts they totally left out some of the tings that needed to be on the power point.
What grade would you give you site?
I would probably give this power point a B.
AC
ReplyDeleteProject 8
Who are you talking about?
• EB and RT: 6th Grade Honors
What do you think of the content?
• The quality was good, easy problems to slightly more complicated, a good standing.
• It was easy to grasp the concept.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were funny, especially that weird looking moose.
• I tried the math on every problem. All answers correct.
What suggestions do you have?
• Use more legible writing. I could barely read it.
• The moose guy was hilarious to add in.
• Nothing really else needed improvement.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric properly.
• The best was the example equations.
• Just the writing, as stated before.
What grade would you give the site?
• Low A, mainly because of the good work, but brought down because of the writing.
P.H
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
SD and MC
What do you think of the content?
The content was very good. It was very easy to understand and it went a long step by step in order which made it really easy to understand the power point.
Did it grab your attention?
• There weren’t many pictures on the power point presentation besides the graphs so I don’t think that they did very good on the graphics. It was interesting enough to the point where it did want me to do the math that I had just been taught by this power point presentation.
What suggestions do you have?
• I liked how the authors made all of the different titles and the wording different colors so that the people reading it stay entertained. The part that I though could use improvement was that if there had been a background or more pictures it would have made the power point even better than it already was.
What about the rubric?
This power point followed the rubric almost perfectly besides the fact that there weren’t really any pictures on there. Besides that they had everything.
What grade would you give you site?
• I give this power point a B because some of the things from the rubric were missing.
Who are you talking about?
ReplyDelete• The person I did was E.W and B. T
What do you think of the content?
This power point was really good. I found that the power point was very well organized and easy to understand. The things in the presentation were all spelled correctly and revised so that there were no mistakes.
Did it grab your attention?
The different backgrounds really caught my attention and kept the power point interesting because of it. It did make me want to go back and try some of the example problems that they put on there to make sure I still knew how to do it.
What suggestions do you have?
The best part of this power point was all the different slides. I liked that they were different and very entertaining to read. I also liked how they lightened the mood at times by saying things like were not done yet and things like that.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric all the way and I don’t have anything in mind that the creators of this power point need to work on.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give this power point an A because nothing was missing.
C.D.
ReplyDelete6th Grade:
A.M. and H.W.
The quality of the math was very good and understandable. I thought they did a good job on their content and mentioned everything they need to. The slideshow didn’t have very many graphics and had the same solid background for each slide. Besides that, the math seemed easy the way they explained and made me want to try it. I would suggest a little more effort on the presentation, but otherwise it was very informative and useful. They also didn’t fully follow the rubric because they are missing a glossary for the terms they used. The part they did the best on would have to be the explanation and the weakest would be the presentation. I would give them a B+.
C.D.
ReplyDelete7th Grade:
B.S. and S.D.
The quality of the math was really good, but it got really hard to understand at some parts. The graphics in the presentation made it easier to understand though and brought some color into it. The directions given did give motivation to do the math, but I didn’t because it seemed like a lot to do for one problem. I would suggest an easier explanation, but the topic of the Pythagorean Proofs I guess I would expect something a little complex. My favorite part of their slideshow would have to be the informative vocabulary that really helped me understand what they were talking about. Then the part that I thought was not as well thought out was the section about the explanation. Overall they did followed the rubric completely and deserve an A.
C.D.
ReplyDelete8th Grade:
A.C. and N.J.
The quality of the math was okay because they didn’t really start explaining anything the 4th and 5th slide and it was only a few sentences of explanation. It was kind of simple to understand since it was just finding the Y- intercept, but they could have added more detail and examples. Nothing was too eye-catching with this presentation except for the interesting repeated background, which made some parts hard to read. The math was very easy to try, but there were no solutions to check my answers on. I would suggest that they add some. My favorite part was the vocabulary because it was the most detailed out of the whole presentation. The part that needed more improving would have to be the explanation and the test. Since they didn’t follow the rubric completely I would have to give them a C.
C.D.
ReplyDelete8th Grade Honors:
A.M. and C.C.
The quality of the math was very well done and extremely easy to understand. Their website had many cool graphics and backgrounds. It was the same background on each page just about, but the way they showed it I never lost interest. The math seemed like anybody could try it. I wouldn’t really suggest anything else. My favorite part of the website was the explanations because of the detail and graphics they put on the page. A part they could improve on would have to be the missing glossary. Besides that their website was very well done and they deserve a B+.
A.J.
ReplyDelete8th Grade
1. Cory R. and Isaac M.
2. The quality of the math was not very good. They didn’t really explain their topic, or give an explanation of what it was that they were talking about. Where they were explaining it, I could understand after re-reading it.
3. It really wasn’t very attention grabbing. It was white text on the same background throughout the entire thing. There were no interesting graphics and it was just very plain. It did not make me want to try it out. I was bored and uninterested.
4. I would tell them to make it more fun, or to add themselves to the presentation. I t was very generic and boring. The best part was the real life situation, even though it had a misspelling. I think a lot of the pages could use improvement, but the one that could use the most was the vocabulary page.
5. They didn’t really follow the rubric. The best part was the real life situation, and the worst part was the vocabulary.
6. I would have to give them a 71%.
A.J.
ReplyDelete7th Grade
1. Amaris B. and LiAnn M.
2. The quality of the math was good. It was easy to understand, and easy to read.
3. The graphics were good. It was easy to read, and there weren’t pictures, but there were interesting backgrounds and a tasteful color scheme. It didn’t really make me want to do math (nothing can make me want to do math), but it was easy to comprehend.
4. I would say to go into more detail, or put the definitions with the words on a separate page… I didn’t personally want to go look for the definitions. The best part of the site was the page talking about the wheel of theodorus. The page was interesting and I paid attention to it because it was fun to read. It needed improvement on the “number types” page. There wasn’t really much explanation on any of the types. It left me guessing.
5. They followed the rubric and their content was good. I think they did the best job on the “real life applications” section they made it easy to understand.
6. I would give them an 84%.
A.J.
ReplyDelete6th Grade
1. Makena F. and Emma R.
2. The quality of the math was good, and it was easy to understand, but there isn’t very much information. Where there is information, it is thorough and easy to understand.
3. It did grab my attention, but it was difficult to see at some points. I liked the notebooks where you had to turn the page, and it kept me interested, but it was hard to see with the background chosen. It did make me want to try it out. They made it look easy judging by the way they explained it.
4. My suggestions would be to use backgrounds that are easier to read on, to use larger text, and to make it easier to find the page titles. On the page that had the flowers, it was hard for me to read the page titles so I could choose a page to go to. Also, I would make SURE to spell check it… there were a few misspellings.
5. I think they did follow the rubric, and they did a pretty thorough job. I think they did the best job on the practice section. It was a little hard to read, but the content was good. I think they needed to improve on the “what is it” section… It was kind of lacking detail.
6. I would personally give them a high B. Something close to an 85%.
A.A.M.
ReplyDelete8th grade honors
Who are you talking about?
• A.M.C.C.
What do you think of the content?
• the math seemed very easy.
• yes they explained it very well and told what it was and what it was for.
Did it grab your attention?
• the graphics were awesome!! They grabbed my attention immediately.
• it did make me want to do the math because it had graphics of how to do it.
What suggestions do you have?
• I wouldn’t give them any except for on the home page, make the button to the next pages a little more obvious
• I loved all of the site!
• just make the website easier to access from the home page.
What about the rubric?
• yes they did.
• they did best on a box and whiskers plot which showed how to plot problems.
• I liked it all so keep it
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give the site an A because it was very nice and was clear and easy to understand. It was very fun and colorful.